Institute for Genocide and Mass Atrocity Prevention, Binghamton University
Higher EducationView the employees at
Institute for Genocide and Mass Atrocity Prevention, Binghamton University-
Saghar Sara Birjandian, PhD. Scholar-practitioner specializing in Transitional Justice and Mass Atrocity Prevention
-
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
-
Rising Star
Kerry Whigham Co-Director, Institute for Genocide and Mass Atrocity Prevention at Binghamton University-
New York City Metropolitan Area
-
Rising Star
Raslan Ibrahim Assistant Professor and Coordinator of the International Relations Program, State University of New York at Geneseo-
United States
-
Rising Star
Trevis Lipnicky Intern at Institute for Genocide and Mass Atrocity Prevention, Binghamton University-
Albany, New York Area
-
Rising Star
Abdul Waheed Ahmad Governance and Development Professional-
Washington, District of Columbia, United States
-
Top 10%
Overview
Binghamton University, the premier public university in the northeastern United States, established the Institute for Genocide and Mass Atrocity Prevention (I-GMAP) with external donor and institutional support in late 2016. I-GMAP is committed to making Binghamton University a leading actor in the international community of atrocity prevention scholars and practitioners. Our Mission The three-fold mission of I-GMAP is: -to increase understanding, develop commitment, and build capacity for effective prevention of genocide and other mass atrocities; -to bring all the forces of the University to bear on atrocity prevention, including research, teaching, convening and outreach; and -to break down barriers and build bridges between academics and practitioners, across multiple disciplines, and among scholars, policy makers and civil society actors. Why an Institute on Prevention? I-GMAP aims to push the field beyond the study of the Holocaust and other past genocides or the prediction of future risks based on analysis of data, to focus on prevention. I-GMAP recognizes mass atrocities as complex processes that include multiple opportunities for disruption or prevention. As opposed to the limited view of atrocity prevention as conflict management and intervention in the midst of crisis, I-GMAP advocates for a broad definition of mass atrocity prevention that includes strategies to reduce the likelihood of violence before it starts, mitigate harm and motivate an end to conflicts once they begin, and rebuild in the aftermath of atrocities. This model of atrocity prevention also assigns responsibility for prevention to individuals and organizations in all lines of work and at all levels, not simply the official leaders of nation states. Effective prevention thus spans all disciplines and professions.
-