Experience

Missouri Western State University
• United States
• Higher Education
• 500 - 600 Employee
• Provost and Vice President of Academic Affairs

  • Jul 2022 - Present

Higher Education
• Malaysia
• Education Administration Programs
• 1 - 100 Employee
• Higher Education

  • May 2022 - Jul 2022


Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP)

• United States
• Higher Education
• 1 - 100 Employee

• Site Visitor

  • Aug 2015 - Jul 2022

  CAEP site visitors are professionals skilled in evaluation techniques such as the interpretation of quantified data and qualitative measures, the use of rating scales and questionnaires, interviewing and observation techniques, reading and analyzing narrative information, and writing observations and evaluations. In training sessions they learn to make sound judgments about EPPs based on the self-study report and supporting evidence prepared by the EPP to make its case for accreditation and the… Show more CAEP site visitors are professionals skilled in evaluation techniques such as the interpretation of quantified data and qualitative measures, the use of rating scales and questionnaires, interviewing and observation techniques, reading and analyzing narrative information, and writing observations and evaluations. In training sessions they learn to make sound judgments about EPPs based on the self-study report and supporting evidence prepared by the EPP to make its case for accreditation and the investigations of the evidence during the site visit. Show less CAEP site visitors are professionals skilled in evaluation techniques such as the interpretation of quantified data and qualitative measures, the use of rating scales and questionnaires, interviewing and observation techniques, reading and analyzing narrative information, and writing observations and evaluations. In training sessions they learn to make sound judgments about EPPs based on the self-study report and supporting evidence prepared by the EPP to make its case for accreditation and the… Show more CAEP site visitors are professionals skilled in evaluation techniques such as the interpretation of quantified data and qualitative measures, the use of rating scales and questionnaires, interviewing and observation techniques, reading and analyzing narrative information, and writing observations and evaluations. In training sessions they learn to make sound judgments about EPPs based on the self-study report and supporting evidence prepared by the EPP to make its case for accreditation and the investigations of the evidence during the site visit. Show less



Higher Learning Commission

• United States
• Higher Education
• 1 - 100 Employee

• Peer Reviewer

  • 2015 - Jul 2022

  Peer Reviewers evaluate member institutions for adherence to the Commission’s Criteria for Accreditation. In addition, they offer consultative feedback that contributes to the quality of an institution’s processes and academic offerings. Peer review entails bringing judgment based on experience and knowledge to the evaluation process. In all evaluation processes, judgment, reason, and the documentation of evidence contribute to effective peer review. Effective judgment of the Criteria… Show more Peer Reviewers evaluate member institutions for adherence to the Commission’s Criteria for Accreditation. In addition, they offer consultative feedback that contributes to the quality of an institution’s processes and academic offerings. Peer review entails bringing judgment based on experience and knowledge to the evaluation process. In all evaluation processes, judgment, reason, and the documentation of evidence contribute to effective peer review. Effective judgment of the Criteria for Accreditation requires that any evaluation be informed significantly by the context of the institution being evaluated and its mission. The review process requires examination of submitted materials, participation in an evaluation (on ground or online) and report writing. HLC Peer Corps members activities include— • Consult with team members and institutional representatives • Listen carefully and attentively, without judgment • Work effectively and collaboratively with members of the review team • Prepare thoroughly for assignments; attend to detail as required • Communicate tactfully with various institutional representatives • Communicate team findings to institutional representatives in a constructive manner • Evaluate processes and identify quality improvement • Maintain confidentiality regarding results of evaluations Show less Peer Reviewers evaluate member institutions for adherence to the Commission’s Criteria for Accreditation. In addition, they offer consultative feedback that contributes to the quality of an institution’s processes and academic offerings. Peer review entails bringing judgment based on experience and knowledge to the evaluation process. In all evaluation processes, judgment, reason, and the documentation of evidence contribute to effective peer review. Effective judgment of the Criteria… Show more Peer Reviewers evaluate member institutions for adherence to the Commission’s Criteria for Accreditation. In addition, they offer consultative feedback that contributes to the quality of an institution’s processes and academic offerings. Peer review entails bringing judgment based on experience and knowledge to the evaluation process. In all evaluation processes, judgment, reason, and the documentation of evidence contribute to effective peer review. Effective judgment of the Criteria for Accreditation requires that any evaluation be informed significantly by the context of the institution being evaluated and its mission. The review process requires examination of submitted materials, participation in an evaluation (on ground or online) and report writing. HLC Peer Corps members activities include— • Consult with team members and institutional representatives • Listen carefully and attentively, without judgment • Work effectively and collaboratively with members of the review team • Prepare thoroughly for assignments; attend to detail as required • Communicate tactfully with various institutional representatives • Communicate team findings to institutional representatives in a constructive manner • Evaluate processes and identify quality improvement • Maintain confidentiality regarding results of evaluations Show less


College of Education, Human Performance, and Health
• Dean

  • Jan 2018 - May 2022


University of Michigan-Dearborn

• United States
• Higher Education
• 700 & Above Employee

• Associate Dean, College of Education, Health, and Human Services

  • Jul 2014 - May 2022

• Associate Professor

  • Sep 2005 - May 2022



Office of Program Evaluation

• Program Evaluator

  • Jan 2002 - Aug 2004

  As doctoral student, worked as team member and led teams providing program evaluation services for grants and projects including NSF and state Department of Education grants. Experience in qualitative and quantitative methodologies including focus groups, instrument design, observational instrument design and calibration, analysis and synthesis of evaluation data and report /deliverable production. As doctoral student, worked as team member and led teams providing program evaluation services for grants and projects including NSF and state Department of Education grants. Experience in qualitative and quantitative methodologies including focus groups, instrument design, observational instrument design and calibration, analysis and synthesis of evaluation data and report /deliverable production.